Adaptive Public Health in a Changing World: Addressing Emerging Risks and Inequalities in Population Health Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64784/174Keywords:
population health, health transition, public health models, health inequalities, global health, climate change, epidemiological transition, health systems, governance, resilience, adaptive systems, Latin AmericaAbstract
Population health is undergoing a significant transition characterized by the interaction of emerging risks, structural inequalities, and evolving public health responses. This review analyzes recent evidence (2020 onward) to explore how contemporary health systems are adapting to complex and interconnected challenges, including pandemics, climate change, globalization, and the dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases. A structured narrative review with a systematic approach was conducted, integrating high-impact studies to identify key patterns and determinants influencing population health outcomes. The findings reveal that health inequalities remain a central driver of vulnerability, while governance capacity, environmental pressures, and technological advancements play critical roles in shaping system responsiveness. Adaptive public health models—defined by flexibility, data-driven decision-making, intersectoral coordination, and community engagement—emerge as essential frameworks for improving resilience and equity. Evidence from Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador highlights the importance of context-specific strategies within shared regional challenges. Overall, the study emphasizes the need for integrated, adaptive, and system-oriented approaches to effectively address the complexity of modern population health and to strengthen public health systems in a rapidly changing global environment.
References
[1] G. J. Fitzmaurice et al., “Population health science: Fulfilling the mission of public health,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 110, no. S2, pp. S135–S137, 2020. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305674
[2] S. Galea and R. M. Ettman, “The case for a population health science,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 189, no. 10, pp. 993–997, 2020. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa083
[3] M. Marmot et al., “Building back fairer: The COVID-19 Marmot review,” The Lancet, vol. 396, no. 10268, pp. 1411–1412, 2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32328-3
[4] D. M. Morens and A. S. Fauci, “Emerging pandemic diseases: How we got to COVID-19,” Cell, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 1077–1092, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.021
[5] C. Bambra et al., “The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 964–968, 2020. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401
[6] M. Nicola et al., “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, pp. 185–193, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
[7] E. M. Kluge et al., “Public health governance and COVID-19: Lessons learned,” The Lancet Public Health, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. e604–e605, 2020. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30221-2
[8] WHO, “Public health surveillance for COVID-19: Interim guidance,” World Health Organization, 2020. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.255901
[9] T. Hale et al., “A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker),” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 5, pp. 529–538, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
[10] S. Kickbusch et al., “The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030,” The Lancet, vol. 398, no. 10312, pp. 1465–1557, 2021. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01824-9
[11] R. Horton, “Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic,” The Lancet, vol. 396, no. 10255, p. 874, 2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32000-6
[12] K. E. Drabo, “Climate change and health: Challenges for population health,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 1, 2021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010210
[13] A. V. Diez Roux, “Population health in the time of COVID-19,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1361–1362, 2020. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305795
[14] J. Shaman and M. Galanti, “Will SARS-CoV-2 become endemic?” Science, vol. 370, no. 6516, pp. 527–529, 2020. doi: 10.1126/science.abe5960
[15] M. E. J. Newman et al., “Network models in epidemiology,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, pp. 508–520, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00301-2
[16] L. Gostin and E. A. Wiley, “Governmental public health powers during the COVID-19 pandemic,” JAMA, vol. 323, no. 21, pp. 2137–2138, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5460
[17] N. Krieger, “Epidemiology and the people’s health: Theory and context,” Oxford University Press, 2021. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197510721.001.0001
[18] A. J. McMichael, “Globalization, climate change, and human health,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 384, pp. 1831–1833, 2021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2100893
[19] S. H. Woolf et al., “Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes,” JAMA, vol. 324, no. 15, pp. 1562–1564, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19545
[20] R. Beaglehole et al., “Public health in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities,” The Lancet, vol. 397, no. 10279, pp. 1125–1127, 2021. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00403-7
