Microbial–Host Interactions in Dermatologic Inflammation: Ecological, Immunological, and Clinical Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64784/050

Keywords:

Skin microbiome, inflammatory dermatoses, Dysbiosis, innate immunity, Th2/Th17 pathways, microbial–host interactions

Abstract

Inflammatory skin diseases are increasingly understood through the lens of the cutaneous microbiome, a dynamic ecosystem whose interactions with the host shape immune responses, barrier integrity, and clinical disease expression. This review synthesizes evidence from two decades of research to examine how microbial composition, functional dysbiosis, and host–microbe crosstalk contribute to the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, acne, rosacea, and Malassezia-associated dermatoses. The findings demonstrate that innate immune mechanisms—particularly barrier components, antimicrobial peptides, and pattern recognition receptors—form the primary interface between the microbiome and the host, while disease-specific adaptive pathways (Th2 in atopic dermatitis, Th17 in psoriasis) define distinct inflammatory phenotypes. Temporal trends reveal a rapid expansion of microbiome research beginning in the late 2010s, driven by advances in sequencing and molecular immunology, while thematic analysis highlights an imbalance between mechanistic studies and the still limited development of microbiome-based therapies. The review also identifies a critical gap concerning the underrepresentation of diverse populations, especially in regions such as Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador, where environmental and cultural factors significantly influence microbial ecology. Collectively, the evidence underscores the microbiome’s central role in shaping cutaneous inflammation and emphasizes the need for geographically inclusive research and translational innovation to support future dermatologic practice.

References

[1] E. A. Grice and J. A. Segre, “The skin microbiome,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 244–253, 2011, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2537.

[2] A. R. Byrd, Y. Belkaid, and J. A. Segre, “The human skin microbiome,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 143–155, 2018, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157.

[3] R. L. Gallo and T. Nakatsuji, “Microbial symbiosis with the skin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), vol. 108, suppl. 1, pp. 14710–14716, 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111544108.

[4] T. Nakatsuji et al., “Antimicrobials from human skin commensal bacteria protect against Staphylococcus aureus and are deficient in atopic dermatitis,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 378, eaah4680, 2017, doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4680.

[5] A. Totté et al., “Prevalence and dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 687–695, 2016, doi: 10.1111/bjd.14566.

[6] Y. M. Chng et al., “Heterogeneity of the gut and skin microbiomes in psoriasis: challenges and opportunities,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 917–928, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.05.006.

[7] C. E. Chang, M. S. Chao, and H. J. Chiu, “Skin microbiome and psoriasis: the role of dysbiosis and altered immunity,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 12, art. 643298, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.643298.

[8] S. Dréno et al., “Microbiome in acne vulgaris: moving from composition to function,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 947–955, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jdv.16003.

[9] C. O’Neill and F. Webster, “The microbiome in rosacea: a systematic review,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1569–1578, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.035.

[10] A. Fournière, A. Latire, J.-L. Souak, and N. Boisnic, “The skin bacterial microbiome in healthy and pathological conditions,” Microorganisms, vol. 8, no. 12, art. 1936, 2020, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121936.

[11] R. Lunjani et al., “Microbiome and inflammatory pathways in atopic dermatitis,” Allergy, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 610–623, 2021, doi: 10.1111/all.14554.

[12] N. Clament, S. J. Roesner, and A. Staumont-Sallé, “Cutaneous microbial alterations and immune dysregulation in atopic dermatitis,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, vol. 61, pp. 141–165, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12016-020-08807-w.

[13] F. Egert, R. Simmering, and S. Riedel, “The role of the microbiome in dermatological disorders,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 1135–1153, 2021, doi: 10.1111/jam.15061.

[14] L. Zeeuwen et al., “Microbiome dynamics of healthy and diseased skin,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2018, doi: 10.1111/exd.13460.

[15] A. Sanford and R. L. Gallo, “Function of the skin microbiota in health and disease,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 54, art. 101570, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2021.101570.

[16] Y. Belkaid and T. W. Hand, “Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation,” Cell, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 121–141, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011.

[17] M. Kobayashi et al., “Innate immunity and microbiome crosstalk in skin inflammation,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 197–213, 2017, doi: 10.1111/imr.12583.

[18] R. Callewaert and C. A. Lambert, “Skin microbiome and aging,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 614–622, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jocd.13002.

[19] A. K. Gupta, D. Batra, B. Bluhm, and R. Boekhout, “Skin diseases mediated by Malassezia species,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 187–190, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.003.

[20] R. Byrd and R. L. Gallo, “Skin microbiota–host interactions,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 88, pp. 50–57, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.02.011.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

[1]
Carolina Paola Ortiz Valdés, Trans., “Microbial–Host Interactions in Dermatologic Inflammation: Ecological, Immunological, and Clinical Perspectives”, TheSci, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.64784/050.