Advancing Healthcare Worker Safety Through Simulation-Based Occupational Health Training: A Comprehensive Review of Educational Competencies, Implementation Strategies, and Future Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64784/275Keywords:
simulation-based education, occupational health, healthcare workers, occupational safety, medical education, competency-based education, patient safety, healthcare simulation, emergency preparedness, workplace hazards, infection prevention, interdisciplinary training.Abstract
Simulation-based occupational health training has become an increasingly important educational approach for improving the safety competencies of healthcare workers in complex clinical environments. This review aimed to synthesize current scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of simulation-based educational strategies in developing occupational health competencies, enhancing emergency preparedness, promoting adherence to safety protocols, and strengthening organizational safety culture. A narrative review was conducted following the scientific method through systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar using predefined eligibility criteria. Twenty high-quality publications addressing simulation-based occupational health education were included and analyzed thematically. The reviewed evidence consistently demonstrated that simulation improves technical performance, communication, teamwork, leadership, situational awareness, and clinical decision-making while facilitating the acquisition of competencies necessary for preventing occupational hazards. Biological hazards remained the most frequently addressed topic; however, contemporary educational programs increasingly incorporate psychosocial, ergonomic, chemical, physical, and radiological risk management into multidisciplinary training scenarios. The findings also revealed that simulation contributes to greater compliance with occupational safety protocols, improved emergency preparedness, enhanced professional confidence, and stronger institutional safety culture. Although implementation continues to be influenced by financial resources, faculty development, infrastructure, curriculum integration, and technological availability, successful educational outcomes were consistently associated with effective instructional design, structured debriefing, and institutional commitment rather than technological sophistication alone. Evidence from Latin America further demonstrated that meaningful simulation-based occupational health education can be implemented successfully in resource-constrained settings through context-adapted educational strategies. Overall, simulation-based occupational health training represents an effective competency-based educational methodology capable of strengthening healthcare worker protection and supporting safer, higher-quality healthcare systems worldwide.
References
[1] D. A. Cook, R. Hatala, R. Brydges, B. Zendejas, J. H. Szostek, A. T. Wang, P. J. Erwin, and S. J. Hamstra, “Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” JAMA, vol. 306, no. 9, pp. 978–988, 2011, doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234.
[2] W. C. McGaghie, S. B. Issenberg, E. R. Petrusa, and R. J. Scalese, “A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009,” Medical Education, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x.
[3] S. B. Issenberg, W. C. McGaghie, E. R. Petrusa, D. L. Gordon, and R. J. Scalese, “Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review,” Medical Teacher, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 10–28, 2005, doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.
[4] D. A. Cook, R. Brydges, S. J. Hamstra, B. Zendejas, J. H. Szostek, A. T. Wang, P. J. Erwin, and R. Hatala, “Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 308–320, 2012, doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182614f95.
[5] R. P. Cant and S. J. Cooper, “Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x.
[6] S. Shin, J.-H. Park, and J.-H. Kim, “Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 176–182, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009.
[7] A. Cheng, W. Eppich, V. Grant, J. Sherbino, B. Zendejas, and D. A. Cook, “Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Medical Education, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 657–666, 2014, doi: 10.1111/medu.12432.
[8] J. P. Duff, A. Cheng, J. A. Arora, et al., “Debriefing methods for simulation in healthcare: A systematic review,” Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 46–63, 2024, doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765.
[9] W. J. Eppich, E. A. Hunt, J. M. Duval-Arnould, V. J. Siddall, and A. Cheng, “Structuring feedback and debriefing to achieve mastery learning goals,” Academic Medicine, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1501–1508, 2015, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000934.
[10] M. Alsabri, S. B. B. Castillo, A. Wiredu, et al., “Impact of teamwork and communication training interventions on safety culture and patient safety in emergency departments: A systematic review,” Journal of Patient Safety, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. e351–e361, 2022, doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000782.
[11] J. H. Verbeek, B. Rajamaki, S. Ijaz, R. Sauni, E. Toomey, B. Blackwood, C. Tikka, J. H. Ruotsalainen, and F. S. K. Balci, “Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 5, Art. no. CD011621, 2020, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5.
[12] C. Mosher, F. Mukhtar, N. Alnaami, Y. A. Akkielah, J. Alsharif, T. Khan, H. C. Taskiran, and M. Zafar, “Donning and doffing of personal protective equipment: Perceived effectiveness of virtual simulation training to decrease COVID-19 transmission and contraction,” Cureus, vol. 14, no. 3, Art. no. e22943, 2022, doi: 10.7759/cureus.22943.
[13] S. Hall, B. Poller, C. Bailey, et al., “Use of ultraviolet-fluorescence-based simulation in evaluation of personal protective equipment worn for first assessment and care of a patient with suspected high-consequence infectious disease,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 218–228, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.002.
[14] C. Zellmer, S. Van Hoof, and N. Safdar, “Variation in health care worker removal of personal protective equipment,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 750–751, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.005.
[15] M. Somri, S. G. Gaitini, A. Gat, et al., “Removal of contaminated personal protective equipment: Does a verbal protocol reduce self-contamination during simulated doffing?” Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, vol. 13, Art. no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01357-0.
[16] D. Shavit, E. B. Frantsman, A. Ben-David, et al., “Assessment of alternative personal protective equipment by emergency department personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic: A simulation-based pilot study,” Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 202–209, 2020, doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.048.
[17] E. Carvalho, M. Castro, C. Leon, et al., “Multi-professional simulation and risk perception of health care workers caring for Ebola-infected patients,” Nursing in Critical Care, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 256–262, 2019, doi: 10.1111/nicc.12396.
[18] C. F. S. Brandão, F. Collares, and M. A. Marin, “Clinical simulation strategies for knowledge integration in the context of the Brazilian Unified Health System,” International Journal of Medical Education, vol. 11, pp. 164–171, 2020, doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f2d.45c8.
[19] R. M. U. Kaneko and M. H. Lopes, “Form for planning and elaborating high-fidelity simulation scenarios: A validation study,” Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, vol. 30, Art. no. e3581, 2022, doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5457.3581.
[20] World Health Organization, Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Multi-professional Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2011.
