Brain-Computer Interfaces in Modern Neurosurgery: Advances, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64784/271Keywords:
Brain-computer interface, Brain-machine interface, Neurosurgery, Functional neurosurgery, Neuroengineering, Artificial intelligence, Neuroprosthesis, Neural decoding, Neurorehabilitation, Spinal cord injury, Stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Deep brain stimulation, Neural signal acquisition.Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have emerged as one of the most significant technological innovations in modern neurosurgery, integrating neuroscience, biomedical engineering, artificial intelligence, and clinical neurology to establish direct communication between the brain and external devices. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current scientific evidence regarding the neurophysiological foundations, technological evolution, clinical applications, limitations, and future perspectives of BCIs in neurosurgical practice. A qualitative documentary review was conducted following the Scientific Method, using peer-reviewed literature retrieved from internationally recognized databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. The analyzed evidence indicates that current clinical applications are primarily focused on motor restoration, neurorehabilitation, communication recovery, speech neuroprostheses, and adaptive neuromodulation for neurological disorders such as spinal cord injury, stroke, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and drug-resistant epilepsy. Recent advances in machine learning, implantable electrodes, wireless technologies, and closed-loop therapeutic systems have substantially improved neural decoding performance and expanded the potential clinical utility of BCIs. However, important challenges remain regarding long-term signal stability, biocompatibility, surgical safety, economic accessibility, regulatory frameworks, and equitable implementation across different healthcare systems. The available evidence suggests that continued multidisciplinary collaboration and technological innovation will facilitate the progressive integration of BCIs into routine neurosurgical care, supporting personalized therapeutic strategies aimed at improving functional recovery, communication, and quality of life in patients with complex neurological disorders.
References
[1] W. A. Awuah et al., “Bridging Minds and Machines: The Recent Advances of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurological and Neurosurgical Applications,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 189, pp. 138–153, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.104.
[2] H. Zhang et al., “Brain-computer interfaces: the innovative key to unlocking neurological conditions,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 5745–5762, 2024, doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002022.
[3] H. Tayebi et al., “Applications of brain-computer interfaces in neurodegenerative diseases,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 165, no. 6, pp. 131–145, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02038-9.
[4] V. Galiotta et al., “EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces for People with Disorders of Consciousness: Features and Applications. A Systematic Review,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 16, Art. 1040816, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1040816.
[5] D. J. Moses et al., “Neuroprosthesis for Decoding Speech in a Paralyzed Person with Anarthria,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 385, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 2021.
[6] F. R. Willett et al., “High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting,” Nature, vol. 593, pp. 249–254, 2021.
[7] S. N. Flesher et al., “A Brain-Computer Interface That Evokes Tactile Sensations Improves Robotic Arm Control,” Science, vol. 372, no. 6544, pp. 831–836, 2021.
[8] J. D. Simeral, L. R. Hochberg, and J. P. Donoghue, “Brain-Computer Interfaces,” Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 168, pp. 101–123, 2022.
[9] F. R. Willett et al., “A High-Performance Speech Neuroprosthesis,” Nature, vol. 620, pp. 1031–1036, 2023.
[10] S. L. Metzger et al., “A High-Performance Neuroprosthesis for Speech Decoding,” Nature, vol. 620, pp. 1037–1046, 2023.
[11] E. C. Leuthardt, G. Schalk, D. Moran, and J. G. Ojemann, “The Emerging World of Brain-Computer Interfaces,” Neurosurgery, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 189–200, 2023.
[12] M. A. Lebedev and M. A. L. Nicolelis, “Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 767–837, 2022.
[13] J. R. Wolpaw and E. W. Wolpaw, Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2021.
[14] T. Ball, P. Krusienski, N. Birbaumer, and J. del R. Millán, “Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 18, pp. 513–525, 2022.
[15] J. del R. Millán, R. Chavarriaga, and collaborators, “Brain-Machine Interfaces and Neurorehabilitation,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2022.
[16] L. R. Hochberg and J. M. Henderson, “Clinical Brain-Computer Interface Research: Current Progress and Future Directions,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 19, pp. 375–389, 2023.
[17] A. L. Benabid, T. Costecalde, and A. Eliseyev, “An Exoskeleton Controlled by an Epidural Wireless Brain-Machine Interface in a Tetraplegic Patient,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1112–1122, 2021.
[18] E. Musk and Neuralink Team, “An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform with Thousands of Channels,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 21, no. 10, e16194, 2021.
[19] A. H. M. S. Karim et al., “Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurosurgery: Current Progress, Challenges and Future Perspectives,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 114, pp. 85–96, 2024.
[20] M. Ienca and R. Andorno, “Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology,” Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 13, Art. 5, 2021.
