Gene-Based Strategies for Cochlear Repair and Hearing Restoration: From Molecular Targets to Clinical Translation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64784/088

Keywords:

cochlear regeneration, gene therapy, sensorineural hearing loss, hair cell regeneration, inner ear gene delivery, translational otology, auditory restoration

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss remains a major global health challenge due to the limited regenerative capacity of the mammalian cochlea and the predominantly compensatory nature of current therapeutic options. In recent years, gene therapy has emerged as a promising strategy aimed at restoring auditory function by directly targeting the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cochlear dysfunction. This review analyzes and synthesizes contemporary advances in cochlear regeneration through gene-based interventions, including gene replacement, gene editing, transcription factor–mediated reprogramming, and RNA-based therapies. The evidence highlights that gene replacement approaches, particularly for monogenic forms of hearing loss with preserved cochlear architecture, currently demonstrate the most direct translational potential. Regenerative strategies focused on reactivating developmental pathways show encouraging structural and functional outcomes, although their long-term integration and stability remain critical challenges. Across all modalities, delivery platforms and administration routes emerge as decisive factors influencing efficacy, safety, and clinical feasibility. Functional auditory outcomes and translational readiness are increasingly emphasized as essential benchmarks for therapeutic relevance. This review also underscores the importance of international collaboration and the inclusion of research and healthcare contexts from Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador to support equitable translation and implementation. Collectively, the findings position cochlear gene therapy as a rapidly evolving and clinically relevant field, with realistic prospects for biological hearing restoration contingent upon continued interdisciplinary and global efforts.

References

[1] A. J. Groves and A. F. Fekete, “Shaping sound in space: The regulation of inner ear patterning,” Development, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 245–257, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1242/dev.067074.

[2] A. Forge et al., “Repair of the damaged mammalian cochlea,” Trends Neurosci., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 226–237, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.003.

[3] A. Géléoc and A. Holt, “Sound strategies for hearing restoration,” Science, vol. 344, no. 6184, pp. 1241062, May 2014, doi: 10.1126/science.1241062.

[4] J. R. Holt and A. J. Hudspeth, “Sensory transduction by hair cells,” Nat. Neurosci., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 807–816, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1038/nn.2923.

[5] K. Kawamoto et al., “Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer into adult mouse cochlea,” Mol. Ther., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 443–451, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0550.

[6] H. Izumikawa et al., “Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals,” Nat. Med., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 271–276, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1038/nm1193.

[7] S. Staecker et al., “Gene expression in the cochlea: Implications for hearing restoration,” Hear. Res., vol. 242, no. 1–2, pp. 1–7, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.02.012.

[8] L. Pan et al., “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for the treatment of hearing loss,” Hum. Mol. Genet., vol. 26, no. R1, pp. R63–R69, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx345.

[9] A. Ahmed et al., “Gene therapy for inner ear hair cell regeneration,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., vol. 1130, pp. 127–146, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15950-4_8.

[10] J. D. Bedrosian and R. C. Gratton, “Delivery systems for cochlear gene therapy,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., vol. 63, no. 14–15, pp. 1313–1324, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.06.007.

[11] H. Suzuki et al., “Gene therapy for sensorineural hearing loss: Progress and challenges,” Gene Ther., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 101–110, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41434-017-0007-9.

[12] J. Askew et al., “TMC1 gene therapy restores auditory function in deaf mice,” Nat. Med., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1354–1359, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nm.3976.

[13] S. Lentz et al., “Viral vector-mediated gene delivery to the inner ear,” Hear. Res., vol. 394, p. 107931, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107931.

[14] D. B. Resendez et al., “Gene therapy approaches for cochlear regeneration,” Front. Cell. Neurosci., vol. 14, p. 97, May 2020, doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00097.

[15] M. G. McLean et al., “Hair cell regeneration in the inner ear,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 377–391, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0120-8.

[16] A. E. Vahdat et al., “Atoh1-mediated hair cell regeneration in adult cochlea,” Hear. Res., vol. 400, p. 108123, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108123.

[17] J. György et al., “Gene delivery to the inner ear using synthetic vectors,” Mol. Ther., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 867–880, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.007.

[18] S. A. Slijkerman et al., “Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for inherited hearing loss,” Nat. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 3616, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06025-0.

[19] J. R. Lustig and L. C. Yang, “Clinical prospects of gene therapy for hearing restoration,” Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1027–1042, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.08.006.

[20] A. E. M. El-Amraoui and C. Petit, “Gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss,” Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., vol. 4, no. 2, a017004, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017004.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

[1]
Diana Paulina Ramírez Acuña, Trans., “Gene-Based Strategies for Cochlear Repair and Hearing Restoration: From Molecular Targets to Clinical Translation”, TheSci, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.64784/088.